Skip to main content
Swine

Sow and Litter Performance for Individual Crate and Group Hoop Barn Gestation Housing Systems: Progress Report III

Authors
  • Pete Lammers (Iowa State University)
  • Mark S. Honeyman (Iowa State University)
  • John W. Mabry (Iowa State University)
  • Jay D. Harmon (Iowa State University)

Abstract

The effects of gestation system on sow and litter performance over a 2.5 year period were evaluated at the Iowa State University Lauren Christian Swine Research and Demonstration Farm near Atlantic, IA. Gestation housing system treatments were 1) individual gestation crates in a mechanically ventilated, partially slatted floor manure flush confinement building (C); and 2) group pens with individual feed stalls in deep-bedded, naturally ventilated hoop barns (H).

Sows were artificially inseminated in a mechanically ventilated, partially slatted floor confinement breeding barn. Sows were moved as a group to their assigned gestation housing treatment by the ninth day post-weaning. Sows were randomly assigned to gestation housing treatment when the project commenced. All first parity gilts were gestated in individual crates and randomly assigned to a gestation group after breeding for the second parity. Farrowing occurred throughout the year on a bi-weekly schedule. All sows received 2.04 kg per day of a cornsoybean meal diet. During the last trimester of gestation, feed allowance was increased to 2.72 kg. During the winter H sows were fed 25% more feed and C sows were fed 5% more feed.

Reproductive performance was summarized for 957 litters and analyzed using general linear models. Number born alive per litter was different for the two housing treatments (P0.1). H sows also weaned 0.4 pigs more per litter (P0.1). Failure to conceive was the leading reason for culling in both treatments. There was a trend for sows gestated in C to be culled for feet and leg unsoundness. H sows tended to be culled for poor body condition. Results indicate that gestating sows can be housed in deep-bedded hoop barns equipped with individual feeding stalls and achieve results comparable or superior to gestating sows housed in individual crated gestation systems.

Keywords: ASL R2171

How to Cite:

Lammers, P., Honeyman, M. S., Mabry, J. W. & Harmon, J. D., (2006) “Sow and Litter Performance for Individual Crate and Group Hoop Barn Gestation Housing Systems: Progress Report III”, Iowa State University Animal Industry Report 3(1). doi: https://doi.org/10.31274/ans_air-180814-269

Downloads:
Download pdf

332 Views

126 Downloads

Published on
2006-01-01

Peer Reviewed