Skip to main content
Reciprocal Meat Conference Abstracts

Antimicrobial Resistance Patterns of Enterococcus Isolated from Feedlot Cattle after Feeding Direct-Fed Microbials in Diets with and Without Tylosin

Authors
  • A. English (Texas Tech University)
  • A. Echeverry (Texas Tech University)
  • J. Sarturi (Texas Tech University)
  • T. Opheim (Texas Tech University)
  • K. Nightingale (Texas Tech University)
  • M. Miller (Texas Tech University)
  • M. Brashears (Texas Tech University)

Abstract

ObjectivesThe purpose of this study was to determine the antimicrobial resistance patterns of Enterococcus isolated from feedlot cattle supplemented with either a direct-fed microbials (DFM; L. salivarius, L28) or tylosin as part of their finishing diet.Materials and MethodsL. salivarius L28 was used in this study, a newly isolated DFM. Three treatments based on conventional high concentrate diets were fed to finishing cattle for harvest: base (no DFM, tylosin or monensin), MonPro (DFM at a feeding rate of 107 cfu/head/d, with monensin, but no tylosin), and a control (tylosin and monensin). A total of 36 composite fecal samples, from 3 animals per pen, were collected after 56 d of feeding. Samples were weighed, enriched and plated onto KF Streptococcus Agar supplemented with 1% TTC solution. Three typical isolates from each plate were randomly selected and streaked onto 5% sheep blood agar for antimicrobial resistance analysis using Sensititre susceptibility MIC plates, following the National Antimicrobial Resistance Monitoring System (NARMS) protocol. The data was analyzed using a Chi-Squared test to compare resistance patterns across treatment group with a significant value of p < 0.05.ResultsEnterococcus was isolated from 100% (n = 36) of fecal samples collected. After 56 d of feeding, 100% (n = 36) of the control group isolates were resistant to at least 1 antibiotic, and 66% (n = 24) were multi-drug resistant (MDR) to 3 or more antibiotics. Isolates from the base treatment group on d 56 exhibited 97% (n = 35) resistance to 1 drug and 28% (n = 10) were MDR. Ninety-4 percent (n = 34) of isolates in the MonPro group showed resistance on d 56, and 47% (n = 17) of isolates were MDR. The percent of isolates with MDR differed significantly between treatments (p = 0.004). Specific antibiotics of concern are listed in Table 1.ConclusionWhile the enterococci isolated in this study, in all 3 treatments, had resistance to at least 1 antibiotic, there were differences in the MDR. The most MDR was observed in the control groups. MDR in the isolates collected from cattle fed the base diet was similar to the isolates from cattle fed the MonPro diet. A total of 10 and 17 of the isolates were MDR, respectively. The supplementation of L28 instead of the tylosin resulted in fewer MDR enterococci. These results indicate that supplementation with a DFM, such as L28, may be effective in mitigating the presence of multi-drug resistnace in feedlot cattle.

Keywords: antimicrobial resistance, enterococcus, direct-fed microbials

How to Cite:

English, A., Echeverry, A., Sarturi, J., Opheim, T., Nightingale, K., Miller, M. & Brashears, M., (2019) “Antimicrobial Resistance Patterns of Enterococcus Isolated from Feedlot Cattle after Feeding Direct-Fed Microbials in Diets with and Without Tylosin”, Meat and Muscle Biology 1(3). doi: https://doi.org/10.221751/rmc2017.129

485 Views

338 Downloads

Published on
2019-01-01